Welcome To The Thought Experiment

If you want to see me reblog clever and cool crap from the interent, check out:
Local Music project:
Everyone Loves A Selfie….

Everyone Loves A Selfie….

Inspired by the score to the show ”True Detective”

Consider how textbooks treat Native religions as a unitary whole. The American Way describes Native American religion in these words: “These Native Americans [in the Southeast] believed that nature was filled with spirits. Each form of life, such as plants and animals, had a spirit. Earth and air held spirits too. People were never alone. They shared their lives with the spirits of nature.” Way is trying to show respect for Native American religion, but it doesn’t work. Stated flatly like this, the beliefs seem like make-believe, not the sophisticated theology of a higher civilization. Let us try a similarly succinct summary of the beliefs of many Christians today: “These Americans believed that one great male god ruled the world. Sometimes they divided him into three parts, which they called father, son, and holy ghost. They ate crackers and wine or grape juice, believing that they were eating the son’s body and drinking his blood. If they believed strongly enough, they would live on forever after they died.” Textbooks never describe Christianity this way. It’s offensive. Believers would immediately argue that such a depiction fails to convey the symbolic meaning or the spiritual satisfaction of communion.

Lies My Teacher Told Me, James Loewen (via whoistorule)

(via deafmuslimpunx)

As a “Militant Atheist”, I find the brief description of Christianity just fine. It is simply too succinct to delve into the history and nuances of Christianity, and not all Christians regularly take the sacrament, but it is accurate.

"But Peter, that makes Christianity sound silly!" You say. Did I mention I am a militant atheist? I get that the description of Native American religion isn’t accurate. The description doubtlessly glosses over the nuances of their beliefs.

However, if we can suppress the white guilt for two seconds here, let’s not put any belief on a pedestal. Too often, I see self-styled SJW’s rail against the social construct of gender, and the social construct of race, only to defend the social construct of culture (only the culture of those they deem oppressed though). Culture is virtually by definition a social construct. It is a set of beliefs, ideas, traditions, practices, etc a group of people hold in common and teach to their children. It might be better described as the meta-construct from which all other social constructs stem.

Never forget that beliefs and ideas can and should be questioned and possibly refuted. By way of religion and culture, many (if not most or all) of the world’s injustices are sanctioned and maintained. I can think of no idea more toxic to social justice than cultural relativism, and yet I see countless social justice advocates embrace it (at least in a superficial and hypocritical way). Most likely, it is because they are terrified of criticizing other people’s culture. But this fear leads them to make excuses for things they would find appalling if it happened in their own culture. Thus, they betray their own values.

And another thing: Stop using history as the basis of ethical arguments as if it is the be-all, end-all factor! “We can’t criticize the (injustice/oppression) in (insert country) because (insert historical injustice perpetrated by Europeans)!” says the SJW that has drunk deep of the cultural relativism kool-aid. No, forcing your values and principles on others is wrong, but that’s not the same as standing for and advocating your values and principles. Oppression does not become Ok because it is happening in a formerly colonialized country. Religions and beliefs don’t magically become valid because it might hurt the feelings of people that have been historically oppressed by the white man to say that they are superstations (just like the things white people believe). Hell, maybe we can all find our common humanity in the universal human predilection for superstation.

And if you are going to excuse things on the basis that it is wrong to criticize people’s culture, then try applying that logic to western culture as well and see if it is even possible to be both a social justice advocate and a non-hypocritical cultural relativist. Sexism a problem in the US? Well, that’s just American culture! We don’t want to criticize someone’s culture, do we? Stupid frat boy wearing a culturally insensitive Halloween costume? Well, cultural chauvinism is just another deeply rooted part of American culture. You see where this is going?

Doubtlessly, people can criticize other people’s cultures in a way that is ethnocentric and culturally chauvinistic. This sort of behavior usually comes from people being too in love with their own cultures. There is no right kind of food to eat, or right kind of clothing to wear. Superficial differences like that do not make one culture better than another. Every society and culture has its flaws, and its injustices, and its beliefs that are just flat out wrong. Do not try to overcompensate for the ethnocentric attitudes of others by trying to flatter other cultures and tell them their shit can’t possibly stink because of all the bad things the white man did.


(via shming)

Dont forget the key card….

Dont forget the key card….

PondFest: Part 1

Doomfuck At Nectar’s: Part 1


i identify with fight club a lot because i also like to express my nonconformity through traditional masculine violence and misogyny. it really goes against what society wants me to do. no wait

HA HA, this goes to my theory that Anti-Feminism is like Fight Club, except instead of men taking their frustration out on faceless corporate entities, they blame feminism for their problems instead.

(via monsterlovepoems)

Some insight into why the feminist label is so unpopular.

Some insight into why the feminist label is so unpopular.

White Guy Record Collection and Cultural Materialism


Last week, I was hanging out with a couple of friends and I mentioned an electronic music artist that I had heard about in the context of “shows I would actually go to.” I don’t like shows any more (not a position- just can’t help it…social anxiety / burnt on rock clubs, etc.) but I saw this…

I agree. Especially the part about Derrida. Fuck Derrida!

But in all seriousness, and speaking of Derrida, not only do people do this with music/art/movies, but also with things like philosophy. Yes, I majored in philosophy. No, I do not want to have a conversation about (insert philosopher here) regardless of whether I have read them or not. No, I am not impressed that you have, and I probably don’t care what you think on the subject. submit it in the form of an essay rather than your vague and rambling thoughts and I might be interested.

(via wehateyourhate)

  • Men: Not ALL men.
  • Men to their daughters: Yes, all men. Every single one of them.

Mary Ocher